> You're missing my simple point:
> If everybody has an IQ of, say 100, how fair is it for the
> 160 genius to turn around and call everyone "stupid"? I
> mean, he's the exception. 100 is the rule (and "normal",
> not stupid).
You're assuming that an IQ of 100 has any meaning... or for that
matter, an IQ of any arbitrary value. :)
Yes, I know, that's asside from your point also. :)
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.fusiontap.com
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- RE: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Michael Dinowitz
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Kevin Graeme
- RE: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Angel Stewart
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Irvin Gomez
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Ben Doom
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Ben Doom
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz S . Isaac Dealey
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Charlie Griefer
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Ben Doom
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz S . Isaac Dealey
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz S . Isaac Dealey
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Irvin Gomez
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz S . Isaac Dealey
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Ben Doom
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz S . Isaac Dealey
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Jochem van Dieten
- RE: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Harkins, Patrick
- RE: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Harkins, Patrick
- Re: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Larry C. Lyons
- RE: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz Harkins, Patrick
- RE: On stupidity & Michael Dinowitz S . Isaac Dealey