> S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
>> Why is it you'd rather these people not get a trial? ...
>> It seems like
>> these are conditions in which no jury would ever allow
>> them to slide,
>> so ... it doesn't seem as though the jury system would
>> fail in these
>> cases.
> Are you implying that a jury that does something else as
> convict the suspect by definition takes the wrong
> decision? Isn't that why there is a jury, to weight a case
> on its merits and let somebody of the hook if they believe
> he is innocent?
No I'm just saying that I would find it surprising to see a case where
a jury found someone involved in the hijacking of an airplane or
taking hostages (as examples) innocent particularly after lives had
been lost. Although I could see a theoretical possibility of someone
receiving a lenient sentence for aiding terrorists because their
actions are motivated by fear for their own safety. Anyone holding a
gun in these situations is more than just aiding, but I think we still
need a jury to make those decisions.
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.fusiontap.com
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism Michael Dinowitz
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism S . Isaac Dealey
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism S . Isaac Dealey
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism S . Isaac Dealey
- RE: Russia vs Terrorism Tangorre, Michael
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism S . Isaac Dealey
- RE: Russia vs Terrorism S . Isaac Dealey
- RE: Russia vs Terrorism Tangorre, Michael
- RE: Russia vs Terrorism Angel Stewart
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism S . Isaac Dealey
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism S . Isaac Dealey
- RE: Russia vs Terrorism S . Isaac Dealey
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism Jerry Johnson