-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. I've never seen Kerry talk about any of these views.
http://www.johnkerry.com
I'm guessing you're not in a contended State. We get the TV ads
constantly here from both sides and Kerry's are more issue based than
attack; whereas, the Bush ads tend to be more about attacking Kerry
though there are some that are issues.
I'm in Illinois. One of those votes that won't count. And I haven't seen
anything on the issues and the local paper I read, the Chicago Trib, which is
more conservative then liberal has published several articles on his lack of
focus on issues.
> So while it is easy to call a view "tautlogy", which I am not even sure
that
> the heck that means,
A tautology is a type of logical argument.
I thought you were dissing me, man ;_) I appreciate the thought that I
might be logical.
>he doesn't have a record of being for anything. Being ...
In order to be against something, to have a strong enough opinion that
it is wrong means you have some idea that there is some alternative,
some opposite, something you are for. That means, that "against"
predicates a "for". They are mirrors of each other.. From which
perspective you look at it from is up to you.
It looks like you and I will have to agree to disagree on this. I just look
at against and for being two entirely different beasts, with For being the
solutions side and much more difficult than against.
I know that you and I differ on what issues are important. But to not
know what issues Kerry is for floors me.
I guess that says something about Kerry, me or both! And I am slightly
overstating my lack of knowledge about Kerry's views. But most I have learned
through conversations like this, not from Kerry.
-Kevin
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
