--- Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In order to be against something, to have a strong
> enough opinion that
> it is wrong means you have some idea that there is
> some alternative,
> some opposite, something you are for. That means,
> that "against"
> predicates a "for". They are mirrors of each
> other.. From which
> perspective you look at it from is up to you.
If you choose not to decide you still have made a
choice. -Rush (the Band not the enemy)
:)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- RE: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Matthew Small
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Kevin Graeme
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) dana tierney
- RE: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Andy Ousterhout
- RE: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Ray Champagne
- RE: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Andy Ousterhout
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) dana tierney
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Kevin Graeme
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) dana tierney
- RE: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Andy Ousterhout
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Sam Morris
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) G
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Kevin Graeme
- RE: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Andy Ousterhout
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Kevin Graeme
- RE: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Andy Ousterhout
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) dana tierney
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Sam Morris
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) dana tierney
- Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Sam Morris
- RE: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?) Andy Ousterhout