1. Are North's his issues with the UN valid? By this I meant his central
theme that the UN's inability to act versus talk has made them irrelevant both
historical and now
2. And doesn't his underlying theme of "waiting causes more harm" have
historical validity?
-----Original Message-----
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 1:33 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The politicization of the Iraq War
Your first question as I recall had to do with Annan "declaring" the
invasion illegal.
Your second was, is Iraq better off?
My answer (trying to make this specific for ya) is 1) did not happen
as presented and 2) No
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:25:27 -0500
Subject: RE: The politicization of the Iraq War
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dana, Dana, Dana...
I was much more specific than that on the North piece. Even the devil
throws
in some words of wisdom while trying to trick the innocent.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 1:11 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The politicization of the Iraq War
::shrug:: CBS News has been mistaken. So have the Washington Post and
the New York TImes and no doubt other less-known papers. But hey, they
print a correction when they are mistaken, and there is a very big
step from being mistaken to the sort of distortion and unsupported
innuendo Andy asked me to critique the other day.
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:58:21 -0400
Subject: Re: The politicization of the Iraq War
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I thought that was CBS News.
>reference them all you want, just don't expect anyone else to take
>them seriously.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
>Subject: Re: The politicization of the Iraq War
>To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I guess you didn't get the memo.
>
>Can't reference any of these no matter how true:
>
>Washington Times: it's owned by Rev Moon.
>Ollie North: He's a felon
>Rush Limbaugh: Was a drug addict
>Bill O'Reilly: They just don't like him
>NY Post: They listed the wrong Vice-Pres pick for
>Kerry
>Michael Savage: hehehe just kidding he really is a
>nut!
>Dick Morris: Talks too much to hookers
>Fox News: All lies, lies, lies.
>
>-sm
>
>
>
>--- Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:________________________________________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
