uhhhhh tony remember the part about how Canada was the bad guy in this because they had half their army in Afghanistan and didn't want to send the other half to Iraq? Try to keep up now.
Dana On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:17:36 -0500, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i personally think its sad that our neighbors to the north are kinda > backing down from their us affiliation partly because its no longer cool > to be friends with the us. fuck if it wasnt for us... canada might be > russian right > now... and that wouldnt be good either... > > tw > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:04:01 -0500, Larry C. Lyons > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So you think that there is no such thing as sovereignty and air > > rights. Also in that case I guess that the arguments the US put > > forward since the 50's regarding control of US air space was specious > > - hey the aircraft/missile was over 10 feet from the ground. > > > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:20:41 -0500, Michael Dinowitz > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If a missile launched at America is over Canada, then I believe it is not > > > only allowed but required to shoot it down. We're not talking a missile at > > > 10 feet over the ground. When it's over Canada, it's miles up. When it's > > > over the Arctic, it's miles up and not over Canada. > > > We're talking lives here. We're talking a specific situation where lives > > > are > > > at risk. When it comes to saving lives, I say screw airspace! save people > > > before political posturing. > > > > > > > > > > So its OK to violate another nation's sovereignty whenever you want > > > > and with no consequences. I guess the converse would also be true, > > > > other nations can violate US airspace at will then without > > > > consequences. > > > > > > > > Typical US attitude - screw the rest of the world, especially your > > > > allies. Real brilliant.It will get to the point that the only US > > > > allies will be paid. > > > > > > > > As for the missile tracks - remember where a good third of the ICBM's > > > > are based, and how many of those russian nukes are really controlled > > > > by Moscow. > > > > > > > > larry > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:33:39 -0500, Michael Dinowitz > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> OK, so we either have to keep the Canadians happy or we can save our > > > >> rears. I go for the latter. Screw diplomacy, save my hide! > > > >> http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/mld/myrtlebeachonline/news/nation/10997668.htm > > > >> > > > >> (though chances are we'll never see a missile attack come through > > > >> Canadian air space and they know it. Just posturing) > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:148709 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
