>> When that side will accept nothing but total death of the side? Sell them weapons on the side?
- Jim Sam wrote: >You're dancing again :) >How do you remain neutral when one side uses children as suicide >bombers? When that side will accept nothing but total death of the >side? > > >On 8/15/05, Gruss Gott wrote: > > >>>Sam wrote: >>>Your analogy is all wrong. >>> >>> >>Then you don't understand it. Here are the salient points: >> >>1.) A contract is only as good as the parties that sign it. >>2.) In the case of an ownership dispute, possession is 9/10ths of the law. >>3.) The biggest gun wins. >> >>In this case you've got disputed land being fought over by equally >>matched, militarized parties. Both call the other's military forces >>terrorists and any discussion quickly devolves into justifying murder >>based on "self" defense. >> >>The correct answer is that there is no one right moral answer except >>for these 2 parties to arrange a peaceful settlement. From an >>American point of view we should be a neutral party seeking to >>accomplish that, but for years we haven't been. >> >>So, we should take an honest position. Either: >> >>1.) Declare and ACT neutrally, or >>2.) Take a side and fight to win. >> >>Currently the US position is officially neutral and unofficially with >>Israel. That 's stupid. >> >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Homesite Plus with Dreamweaver from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=55 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:169393 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
