well yes, selective reading would be one defense and denial would be another.
::shrug:: Please feel free to believe what validates your previous beliefs. "The Pentagon adviser on the war on terror confirmed that some in the Administration were looking seriously at this option, which he linked to a resurgence of interest in tactical nuclear weapons among Pentagon civilians and in policy circles. He called it âa juggernaut that has to be stopped.â " >OK, so I saw the link, and I don't see anywhere in there where is said >the administration is planning on nuking anything. > >The authors take is that the only thing we have that could destroy some >of the underground facilities is the nuclear bunker busters. > >Some people claim that we have plans that involve nukes, but there is >nothing that states if we go we will nuke, it is an option that is being >considered. > >We have plans that involve nuking Canada, Mexico and the UK, those plans >are updated every few years, do you think that because those plans exist >we are going to do it? > >we >> > >have to we'll use them. >> > >> > >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205217 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
