I think that isn't true, we were dealing with election law, laws that needed to be examined to determine the outcome. The Constitution provided for this.
Unconventional to me would be circumventing the law outright, either by force or complete trickery. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:47 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys? > > Unconventional in that the courts had to intervene in order to get to > the final result. > > Whether it was right or wrong, whether they made the right decision or > not, is not the point. > > The fact that they were involved at all was not conventional, was it? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:208861 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
