Unconventional in that the courts had to intervene in order to get to the final result.
Whether it was right or wrong, whether they made the right decision or not, is not the point. The fact that they were involved at all was not conventional, was it? On 6/12/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unconventional? How was it anything but conventional? He did what every > President before him did? He ran a campaign to get states. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:208854 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
