I guess my answer is that I don't accept the two options....there has to be a better solution than what we are currently trying, but stops well short of me paying junkies to get high.
I admittedly don't know what that solution is. On 6/22/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It depends on what you value. If you value lower crime, lower taxes, > and money in your pocket then my method (or something similar) is > best. > > If you value a principle and are willing to pay for it they your way is > best. > > Obviously I value lower crime and lower taxes more than a principle - > or at least I'm not will to pay for that principle. So if I need to > pay people to get high, fine. > > As I've said, given the choice between a monthly payment of infinite > duration and a lower payment with an end in sight, I'll always take > the latter as long as it doesn't violate ethics. > > In this case my desire for money creates charity which is the ultimate > beauty of capitalism! > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209993 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
