there is nothing wrong with being in it for the thrill. I am not
passing judgement when I say that. Some people do need to be hunted
down and arrested. With force if necessary.

I don't think this was a case where it was necessary. As previously
noted, we've established that we disagree on this and are unlikey to
agree. Your position worries me a little for what it means about
public perception of the freedoms America says it's fighting for, but
that's a different issue.

Laterz

Dana

On 11/28/06, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I worked as a paramedic for 14 years.  In that time I worked with hundreds
> of police officers and became friends with quite a few.  I would say that a
> small percentage of them were in it 'for the thrill'.  Most were in it
> because they were good people who wanted to pursue a noble profession.  The
> ones who are in it 'for the thrill' are the ones I think we need to be
> concerned about.
>
> I do not think or expect that every police officer is infallible.  I only
> ask that those who have not been in that line of duty not be so quick to
> pass judgement.
>
> --
> Scott Stroz
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:221400
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to