oops. The end of the paragraph was that it says that Occidental gave Gore campain contributions and that Clinton administration policies may have helped Occidental to drill in Columbia. All interesting if true and let's assume for a moment it is; it still doesn't really connect any dots does it?
On 2/28/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am correct am I? About what? This link seems to have been posted in > an attempt to show that Gore is a bad person, but I don't see anything > here about waiving enforcement. It says that Gore's dad owned stock in > Occidental, that > > On 2/28/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You are correct > > http://www.thenation.com/doc/20000522/silverstein/ > > > > > > On 2/28/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > My answer however is that I don't know. If he is though, he is a > > > hypocrite in a relatively small way, especially when compared to > > > people who claim to represent the people of the United States of > > > America yet sign legal documents essentially giving an oil company > > > half a billion dollars. I guess record profits aren't enough any more. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/ Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:229139 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
