So instead of taxing you and using the money to provide services, they instead require you to spend money on s3ender providers?
Aside from the semantics how is that really any different? -----Original Message----- From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 5:16 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Quarterly Campaigning Not in Massachussetts it's not. They require you to buy it from a private insurer. So may Hillary's campaign for all I know -- I remember seeing that someone didn't like it because it kept health insurance privately owned. >Huh? I don't understand. > >What doesn't imply what? > >Universtal Healthcare is a socialist program, it is a state owned and run >insurance program, so it is socialist. > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2 Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:231887 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
