Ok, well this is a new version of the server we're talking about. How about adding "embedded db" as an option?
Haha -----Original Message----- From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 11:05 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: cf8 and client variables > -----Original Message----- > From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 10:38 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: cf8 and client variables > > I disagree. I think making it cookie out of the box makes more sense. > > IMHO if you don't what a cookie is you have no business installing an > application server. It's not just knowing what a cookie is - it's knowing how using cookies changes the way client-variables behave. For what it's worth "Cookie" is definitely the odd-man out in this option: I'm honestly not sure why it was included. "Cookie" really does nothing beyond CFCOOKIE. In this case it also changes the nature of client variables compared to the other options: they're not stored on the server, they're limited in size, they're limited in number, etc. The "Cookie" option really just doesn't fit - defaulting the system to using the exception to the rule seems wrong to me. At the very least I can understand the argument. Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:235885 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
