Whoops! Darn Gmail formatting. Here is the heart of my argument from that post:
APEWS has glommed onto the way blacklists work, which is as trusted sources to block spam. APEWS is abusing that trusted relationship to block very large segments of the Internet in an attempt to coerce the users on those networks to switch operators, and thereby coerce the operators themselves to implement better control over spam coming from their networks. Why is it abuse? Because they are going far beyond the boundaries of what a spam blacklist is meant to do. They are engaging in a political fight using the tools of economic warfare to try to push their agenda. On 6/13/07, Jochem wrote: > > I'm sorry, but the way I see your response does not allow me to make much > sense of it: > http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/thread.cfm/threadid:24326#236603 > > Jochem > -- --------------- Robert Munn www.funkymojo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:236606 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
