I asked if there was any point in even looking. And you found one article? Wow. As I was saying... I'm kinda busy this week.
On 8/9/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually it was four versions of the same article. She only asked for one. > > Do you think they fact that the earth isn't cooking will cause them to > go back and change these papers? > > http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/08/09/did-media-or-nasa-withhold-climate-history-data-changes-public > > > On 8/9/07, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&cluster=2895724914451169384 > > >Enjoy > > > > > > > Merely four articles. lousy. If that's your research then if it were a > > basic research course you'd fail, this one > > > > http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=global+warming+detractor&num=100&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=bio&as_subj=chm&as_subj=eng&as_subj=phy&hl=en&lr= > > > > using global warming and detractor as the keywords came up with 2, but I > > limited the search to hard science areas, like physics, biology, etc. > > > > Global warming cause, again limiting it to physics biology etc, > > http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=100&hl=en&lr=&q=global+warming+cause&btnG=Search&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=bio&as_subj=chm&as_subj=eng&as_subj=phy > > 'Results 1 - 100 of about 30,100 for global warming cause. (0.21 seconds) " > > > > Same search with human added to the keyword search > > http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=100&hl=en&lr=&q=global+warming+human+cause&btnG=Search&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=bio&as_subj=chm&as_subj=eng&as_subj=phy > > Results 1 - 100 of about 17,700 for global warming human cause. (0.21 > > seconds) > > > > Now I only looked at the first 25, but only one was negative, and that was > > a commentary on an article not research. > > > > I think that the consensus from the scientific community is very clear, > > humans are changing the climate and making the world considerably warmer > > than it has been for thousands of years. > > > > An very very small minority who are mostly sponsored by industries who > > would be harmed by measures designed to combat global warming do not > > balance out the hard science. > > > > If its a choice between politics and what the scientific data dictate, I'll > > dump the politics. As anyone who as had even a tiny bit of training in the > > sciences know, the data dictate your conclusions, not one's ideology. > > > > That is of course one follows some form of faith-based "science." > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion 8 - Build next generation apps today, with easy PDF and Ajax features - download now http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:239918 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
