good point. It doesn't follow, it's true

On 8/30/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the people might be, but the lawmakers arent.
>
> tw
>
> On 8/30/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I dunno -- I drove through Alexandria on the way to New Orleans and it
> > seems to be mostly black. Maybe that was just the part of town I
> > happened into,
> >
> > It does seem like a waste of time though.
> >
> > On 8/30/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > i think they should ban the ugly outfits that most businessmen
> > > wear, its offensive to me to see their LACK of ass in their horrible 
> > > pants.
> > >
> > > its a joke. really. i think its whitey telling blackie what to wear...
> > > personally.
> > >
> > > tw
> > >
> > > On 8/30/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I just read this article today:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20500607/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > NEW ORLEANS - Hike up those pants. Droopy drawers that bare skin or
> > > > underwear might soon be forbidden fashion on the streets of two 
> > > > Louisiana
> > > > towns, and violators could be forced to part with some cash.
> > > >
> > > > "I'm tired (of) looking at behinds," Shreveport Councilwoman Joyce 
> > > > Bowman
> > > > said after Tuesday's 4-3 vote to ban fanny-flaunting trousers.
> > > >
> > > > Nobody can be arrested just for violating the ordinance, but they could 
> > > > be
> > > > fined or required to perform community service. The maximum fine for a 
> > > > first
> > > > offense is $100.
> > > >
> > > > Alexandria's City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to ban the baring. 
> > > > Its
> > > > ordinance allows some sag, but 3 inches or more can bring a fine of $25 
> > > > to
> > > > $200 and a requirement for community service.
> > > >
> > > > If the mayors of Shreveport and Alexandria sign the ordinances, they 
> > > > will
> > > > bring Louisiana's total to at least six, with at least two more cities
> > > > considering bans.
> > > >
> > > > Elsewhere, Atlanta's City Council has held a hearing on a measure to 
> > > > outlaw
> > > > saggy pants that reveal shorts or thongs.
> > > >
> > > > A similar proposal in Stratford, Conn., was soundly rejected this week 
> > > > after
> > > > critics argued it would be unconstitutional and unfairly target 
> > > > minorities.
> > > >
> > > > Some opponents cite other objections.
> > > >
> > > > "Are you going to have a 'sagging' court?" Michael Williams asked
> > > > Shreveport's council. "The police have more important things to do than
> > > > chase young boys and girls and say 'pull your pants up."'
> > > >
> > > > Personally I think that it is a good idea. I don't know why, but every 
> > > > time
> > > > I stand in line at the grocery store or the mall and there is one of 
> > > > these
> > > > kids showing most of their underwear, I just want to slap the shit out 
> > > > of
> > > > them. I am sure that some will argue that it is unconstitutional or 
> > > > stifles
> > > > freedom of expression or some bullshit like that, but I feel this is 
> > > > not so
> > > > much freedom of expression as it is obscene. So what do you all think? 
> > > > Are
> > > > people allowed to run around showing off their ass or underwear?
> > > >
> > > > Bruce
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Get involved in the latest ColdFusion discussions, product
development sharing, and articles on the Adobe Labs wiki.
http://labs/adobe.com/wiki/index.php/ColdFusion_8

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:241703
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to