How can you think they, meaning Iran, want a diplomatic resolution when their leader is talking about wiping Israel off the map, saying the holocaust didn't happen, chants of death to America, and not only providing arms but providing troops that fight and kill American soldiers. It seems like they know what would happen if we bombed them and "started a war" and are testing us to the limits (in my opinion they've just about done enough to warrant such actions). BTW, I'm not following this conversation 100% but thought I'd chime in and get your opinion and ideas.
Thansk On 9/28/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > RoMunn wrote: > > How is this not getting through to you all- if Iran continues down the path > > of developing nuclear weapons > > Here's the problem: if we attack Iran we could start a 100 year war of > cultures. > > So a true leader will put together a coalition to solve the issue > through diplomacy rather than force. In the, if Iran gets the bomb, > then they do. NK has it. Pakistan has it. India has it. > > So you need to clarify your position: either you're willing to nuke > Iran today and deal with consequences or you go the diplomatic route > and deal with the consequences. > > Personally I think Iran is scared and that's why the Ayatollah sent > their President to speak with the UN. They want a diplomatic > solution, but there's no decent World leader capable of putting > together a coalition to deliver one. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Enterprise web applications, build robust, secure scalable apps today - Try it now ColdFusion Today ColdFusion 8 beta - Build next generation apps Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:243365 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
