> Bruce wrote: > NY Times of course. And the same reason, irresponsible sensationalism. >
If you're talking about the McCain thing, I think the impact is a little different. In the case of Prince Harry Drudge endangered the lives of soldiers in the field for no news purpose. That is, there's no compelling reason for any of us to know he's there and in doing so we've put him and his whole unit at risk. In the McCain story ... well there's really no impact except giving the talk radio crowd a reason to rally around McCain. I surprised you're not outraged at Drudge putting soldiers lives at risk for no reason. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:255181 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
