Other instances of the Times' irresponsible reporting: Publishing articles on the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War. Exposing that the Treasury Department is monitoring terror funding (Terrorist Finance Tracking Program). Reporting that Pres. Bush authorize the NSA to eavesdrop on Americans and Others in the US without court-approved warrants.
Some of these issues puts the entire nation and possibly the world at risk. Now I know that they always cry first amendment rights and what not, but at what cost is it worth printing things that really should not be printed at all just to make a few bucks? Dana wrote: > McCain is running for president. He has made himself a public figure > and has no reason to whine about people publicizing his affairs, > especially since they do raise a question about his judgment. So > whether the allegation is true or not, there is a legitimate public > policy argument to be made for reporting that the allegations have > been made. I'm willing to entertain the idea that it is not a *good* > argument. But there is one there to be made. > > Prince Harry -- please explain how publishing this story benefits > anyone but our wartime enemies. Seriously. The kid wants to be a > soldier. Why make that hard for him? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:255205 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
