Oh be afraid, be very afraid. But is there really any drama? I mean, you know what he's going to produce.....fast paced, action sequences that go on for ever, with un-funny one liners thrown in, CGI and special affects all over the place.....a poorly written story featuring bad acting and even worse dialogue.....with the occasional bit of coolness thrown in, which just makes you sadder because you know the potential was there.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm really scared of what he's going to do with the live action Star > Wars TV shows they are working on now. > > G Money wrote: > > I am not one bit surprised. > > > > The advances in special affects and this idea that a movie needs to be > ultra > > fast and glitzy has completely ruined George Lucas. The muppet is so > taken > > in by this stuff that he forgets you need to actually tell a story...you > > need screenplay...you need good actors with good material playing off > each > > other.......THAT is what makes a good movie. > > > > You see this same bullshit in the muppet's recent Star Wars prequels. I > > guarantee you he wanted to make a saucerman from mars farce out of > Indiana > > Jones. I imagine the only reason this movie will be passable is the > > dampening affect that Spielberg and Ford will have on the muppet's > > delusions. > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > wrote: > > > >> Well, I just got back from a pre-screening of the movie, and I have to > say, > >> I was kind of disappointed in it. In the first 5 minutes of the movie > >> there's a scene that stretches credibility quite a bit and it kind of > goes > >> downhill from there. Without giving too much away, you'll certainly come > out > >> of this with little doubt that Lucas really *was* pushing to do a movie > >> named "Indiana Jones and the Saucermen from Mars". There's still a lot > of > >> charm to this movie and some decent laughs...but they all just seemed > like > >> cheap, easy laughs and there really wasn't a lot of effort put into > making > >> this a really original, and worthy successor to the earlier Indy movies > >> (well 1 and 3 at least). I expect critics will not have many good things > to > >> say about it, and most fans will come out like me and say "well, it at > least > >> wasn't as bad as Temple of Doom". Not exactly high praise, but it was > still > >> fun to see Indy in action again regardless. > >> > >> --- Mary Jo > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:260393 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
