It needs immedite attention and the correct action.  Though, I admit, I am
not really sure what the correct action is, but smarter people than I don;t
seem to be too sure either.

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Judah McAuley <ju...@wiredotter.com> wrote:

>
> "A failure to act and act now will turn crisis into a catastrophe"
> -- Robert Munn on this fucking list just a couple months ago.
>
> Hope over fear? That's a partisan hack job of the lowest denominator.
> You sounded the alarm and you were right. You got me to agree with you
> even. It is a crisis, it is a catastrophe, it requires immediate and
> total attention and action. I was dubious at first but you were right.
> Don't fuck it up by being a douche about it now that the other side is
> saying it.
>
> Judah
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Robert Munn <cfmuns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > *
> >
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/05/AR2009020502766_pf.html
> > *
> >
> >
> > *"A failure to act, and act now, will turn crisis into a catastrophe.*"
> >
> > *-- President Obama, Feb. 4*.
> >
> > Catastrophe, mind you. So much for the president who in his inaugural
> > address two weeks earlier declared "we have chosen hope over fear."
> Until,
> > that is, you need fear to pass a bill.
> >
> > And so much for the promise to banish the money changers and influence
> > peddlers from the temple. An ostentatious executive order banning
> lobbyists
> > was immediately followed by the nomination of at least a dozen current or
> > former lobbyists to high position. Followed by a Treasury secretary who
> > allegedly couldn't understand the payroll tax provisions in his 1040.
> > Followed by Tom Daschle, who had to fall on his sword according to the
> new
> > Washington rule that no Cabinet can have more than one tax delinquent.
> >
> > The Daschle affair was more serious because his offense involved more
> than
> > taxes. As Michael Kinsley once observed, in Washington the real scandal
> > isn't what's illegal, but what's legal. Not paying taxes is one thing.
> But
> > what made this case intolerable was the perfectly legal dealings that
> > amassed Daschle $5.2 million in just two years.
> >
> > He'd been getting $1 million per year from a law firm. But he's not a
> > lawyer, nor a registered lobbyist. You don't get paid this kind of money
> to
> > instruct partners on the Senate markup process. You get it for picking up
> > the phone and peddling influence.
> >
> > At least Tim Geithner, the tax-challenged Treasury secretary, had been
> > working for years as a humble international civil servant earning
> > non-stratospheric wages. Daschle, who had made another cool million a
> year
> > (plus chauffeur and Caddy) for unspecified services to a pal's private
> > equity firm, represented everything Obama said he'd come to Washington to
> > upend.
> >
> > And yet more damaging to Obama's image than all the hypocrisies in the
> > appointment process is his signature bill: the stimulus package. He
> > inexplicably delegated the writing to Nancy Pelosi and the barons of the
> > House. The product, which inevitably carries Obama's name, was not just
> bad,
> > not just flawed, but a legislative abomination.
> >
> > It's not just pages and pages of special-interest tax breaks, giveaways
> and
> > protections, one of which would set off a ruinous Smoot-Hawley trade war.
> > It's not just the waste, such as the $88.6 million for new construction
> for
> > Milwaukee Public Schools, which, reports the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel,
> > have shrinking enrollment, 15 vacant schools and, quite logically, no
> plans
> > for new construction.
> >
> > It's the essential fraud of rushing through a bill in which the normal
> rules
> > (committee hearings, finding revenue to pay for the programs) are
> suspended
> > on the grounds that a national emergency requires an immediate
> job-creating
> > stimulus -- and then throwing into it hundreds of billions that have
> nothing
> > to do with stimulus, that Congress's own budget office says won't be
> spent
> > until 2011 and beyond, and that are little more than the back-scratching,
> > special-interest, lobby-driven parochialism that Obama came to Washington
> to
> > abolish. He said.
> >
> > Not just to abolish but to create something new -- a new politics where
> the
> > moneyed pork-barreling and corrupt logrolling of the past would give way
> to
> > a bottom-up, grass-roots participatory democracy. That is what made Obama
> so
> > dazzling and new. Turns out the "fierce urgency of now" includes $150
> > million for livestock (and honeybee and farm-raised fish) insurance.
> >
> > The Age of Obama begins with perhaps the greatest frenzy of old-politics
> > influence peddling ever seen in Washington. By the time the stimulus bill
> > reached the Senate, reports the Wall Street Journal, pharmaceutical and
> > high-tech companies were lobbying furiously for a new plan to repatriate
> > overseas profits that would yield major tax savings. California wine
> growers
> > and Florida citrus producers were fighting to change a single phrase in
> one
> > provision. Substituting "planted" for "ready to market" would mean a
> > windfall garnered from a new "bonus depreciation" incentive.
> >
> > After Obama's miraculous 2008 presidential campaign, it was clear that at
> > some point the magical mystery tour would have to end. The nation would
> rub
> > its eyes and begin to emerge from its reverie. The hallucinatory Obama
> would
> > give way to the mere mortal. The great ethical transformations promised
> > would be seen as a fairy tale that all presidents tell -- and that this
> > president told better than anyone.
> >
> > I thought the awakening would take six months. It took two and a half
> weeks.
> >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:287653
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to