Perhaps that is all it was, but what it has become the red herring with which the opponents can derail the entire dialogue on climate change. Someone obviously did not think this through before taking action, so it has become the climate research equivalent of Clinton's blow job.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Michael Grant <mgr...@modus.bz> wrote: > > To me this all just seems like tweaking a few facts to make an underlying > truth have greater impact upon the skeptics. > It's exaggeration not fabrication. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308938 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
