That is very true, and a pretty appropriate analogy. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Perhaps that is all it was, but what it has become the red herring > with which the opponents can derail the entire dialogue on climate > change. Someone obviously did not think this through before taking > action, so it has become the climate research equivalent of Clinton's > blow job. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Michael Grant <mgr...@modus.bz> wrote: > > > > To me this all just seems like tweaking a few facts to make an underlying > > truth have greater impact upon the skeptics. > > It's exaggeration not fabrication. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308942 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
