On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Judah wrote:
>> There is no need for a doom and gloom scenario.
>
> Mm hm, and covering more people under government health is free by
> your calculations as well.

Actually, no, I don't make that claim at all. But you seem chronically
unable to understand statistics, so whatever.

> But there's room for disagreement in these matters.
>
> My advice is to figure out a way to live and work without your car and
> this includes securing your own food supply cause I think a liquid
> fuels crisis is a'comin'.

Fossil fuels are a limited, non-renewable resource. They are going to
go away at some point or another. That's why I've advocated trying to
gain a competitive advantage by investing heavily in non-fossil fuel
energy supplies and leaving the dead-end energy to our growing
economic competitors like India and China.

However, it still doesn't make you assertion that energy consumption
is growing exponentially correct.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:310452
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to