> Judah wrote:
> Actually, no, I don't make that claim at all. But you seem chronically
> unable to understand statistics, so whatever.

Well I think we'd agree that 10% of all statistics are => 80% correct.
 That's a just fact none of us can get around.

> However, it still doesn't make you assertion that energy consumption
> is growing exponentially correct.
>

I don't think anyone could claim correctness there since it's all
based on guesstimates (thus the room for disagreements), although I do
appreciate your passion for government-derived estimates.

But I agree with you that conservation can be considered a fuel and
thus does offset some demand growing in other areas.

But either way there's going to be a liquid fuels crisis first and
odds are that'll be fairly disastrous.  Especially since wave 2 of
current economic crisis is yet to hit.  When you start piling high
fuel prices on top of that the pain will be great.

So I do think there's plenty of room to darkcloud this energy thing.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:310453
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to