specifics please and just don't quote your bloviators. Otherwise how else do we know you're not just blowing it out your ass.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > They used fake models. > Modified temperature readings. > Blocked dissent. > Phony Glacier data and phony Africa drought reports. > > Why are you still supporting this? > > BTW, it was in the summary. > > Same standard? When politicians constantly lie to me I turn against > them. So yes. > > Not so with you. You're like flies on shit with lying politicians. > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> multiple times. Perhaps in your mind. But other than the >> misrepresentation of the Himalayan data, what other prevarications are >> you talking about. At he most 1 page out of 3000. What other errors? >> >> You still have not answered my question, are you willing to apply the >> same standard to the things you agree with. I rather doubt it frankly. >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311121 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
