More taliking points for ya

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/26/more-bogus-agw-information-in-ipcc-report/

Apparently Dr. Rowell made up some shit that made it into the well
respected IPCC report. This time the Amazon has only a 40% chance of
survival, or not.


On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> not good enough sam, you're still parroting talking points.
>
> Lets put it this way. In your analysis what are the specific points.
> Please support these with direct quotes from teh IPCC reports and
> cross referenced by journal articles that support your points.
>
> Otherwise its just your bloviating and not thinking for yourself or
> merely parroting others points.
>
> not a good example of independent thought.
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here you go:
>> http://catallaxyfiles.com/2010/01/22/ipcc-and-peer-review/
>>
>> We also know from the climategate emails that the data and models the
>> report uses was "modified" to hide the decline :)
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm referring to page number and paragraph sections of the report itself.
>>>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311144
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to