Yeah, seems like a weak definition, as then dictator governments where the people have *no say whatsoever* (unlike here) in spending would qualify as socialist too.
It doesn't really seem to be about money, per se, to me. I just wish the same people who were not up in arms about spending buttloads of money on war were the same people not up in arms about spending buttloads of money on wellness. Or something like that. (in general. not directed towards any list denizens.) :den -- A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. William James On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Dana wrote: > > since when? Perhaps you know something I don't but I have never heard > that definiteion before. > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Robert Munn wrote: >> >> It socialism as defined by government spending a certain percentage of >> GDP. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:316588 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
