There's a difference? The all quack like ducks to me... -----Original Message----- From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:47 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!
don't help them co-opt the word conservative. It's a neo-con thing. On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Eric Roberts <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > Making up things and attributing them to someone is a very conservative > tactic... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:57 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! > > > But, it was only discovered that she used the account for government > business BECAUSE fo the hack. > > Using your logic, the ends justify the means - a very conservative > point of view. > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Eric Roberts > <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >> >> I think this is a case that would be similar to one where an IT person or >> anyone else in charge of sensitive data used a weak password and thus > caused >> sensitive data to be released or hacked into. If she didn't use this >> account to transmit government business, we wouldn't have been even > talking >> about this in the first place because it never would have made headlines > and >> the hack probably wouldn't have ever been discovered. Parts of the rules >> are that she use secure and approved (ie a government email account, not >> yahoo) methods to transmit government business for a few reasons. One > it's >> secure and another would be that said business is saved and backed up for >> archival purposes and for access by acts like FOIA. SO yes, she is > culpable >> in that she failed to use a secure account and she failed to properly > secure >> her account. I would say the same for any government official regardless > of >> their party. >> >> Eric >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:57 AM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! >> >> >>> I though I made it quite clear >> >> I don't think you did. However if you are saying that regardless of the > lack >> of wisdom on the victim's part that it's still a crime that should be >> punished then we really don't have a disagreement on the crime. We seem >> however to disagree on the culpability of the victim. >> >> >> >> >> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317323 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
