On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Eric Roberts <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > There's a difference? The all quack like ducks to me... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:47 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! > > > don't help them co-opt the word conservative. It's a neo-con thing. > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Eric Roberts > <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >> >> Making up things and attributing them to someone is a very conservative >> tactic... >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:57 AM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! >> >> >> But, it was only discovered that she used the account for government >> business BECAUSE fo the hack. >> >> Using your logic, the ends justify the means - a very conservative >> point of view. >> >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Eric Roberts >> <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think this is a case that would be similar to one where an IT person or >>> anyone else in charge of sensitive data used a weak password and thus >> caused >>> sensitive data to be released or hacked into. If she didn't use this >>> account to transmit government business, we wouldn't have been even >> talking >>> about this in the first place because it never would have made headlines >> and >>> the hack probably wouldn't have ever been discovered. Parts of the rules >>> are that she use secure and approved (ie a government email account, not >>> yahoo) methods to transmit government business for a few reasons. One >> it's >>> secure and another would be that said business is saved and backed up for >>> archival purposes and for access by acts like FOIA. SO yes, she is >> culpable >>> in that she failed to use a secure account and she failed to properly >> secure >>> her account. I would say the same for any government official regardless >> of >>> their party. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:57 AM >>> To: cf-community >>> Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! >>> >>> >>>> I though I made it quite clear >>> >>> I don't think you did. However if you are saying that regardless of the >> lack >>> of wisdom on the victim's part that it's still a crime that should be >>> punished then we really don't have a disagreement on the crime. We seem >>> however to disagree on the culpability of the victim. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317325 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
