Please show where either of us have stated that Sam. I know it's hard to argue when the facts are against you, but please stop making shit up....that is very dishonorable and dishonest...granted that is something that is expected from teabaggers...
Eric -----Original Message----- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 7:22 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! The kid didn't have a warrant and you've been bitching for years about wireless wiretapping. Based on what both of you have said a warrant isn't needed if they find something illegal. On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think it's called a warrant, lol...that thing you are againt > requiring for wiretaps. > >> So, you are saying the government or anyone else can invade your >> privacy as long as they end up finding illegal activity? >> How's that saying go? You have nothing to worry about as long as you >> don't do anything wrong > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317330 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
