On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> that's not what I said, Sam. I said the police need a warrant.

OK we're getting someplace. So only the police need a warrant,
everyone else can have at it if they find a crime and it's not
admissible in court.

>> The the police can invade your privacy as long as they find something
>> illegal but don't use it in court?
>
> she was not on trial, Sam, that was a criminal case and the guy who
> changed her password was the defendant.

She was, I posted the link yesterday. The Judge said she didn't break
any laws using her Yahoo email for business.

>> She broke no laws according to the Judge.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317339
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to