You have said that you feel she bears some blame for what happened. That is an opinion, not fact. (and pretty much the only thing I think we disagree on - at least on this issue)
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Eric Roberts <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > Please show where either of us have stated that Sam. I know it's hard to > argue when the facts are against you, but please stop making shit up....that > is very dishonorable and dishonest...granted that is something that is > expected from teabaggers... > > Eric > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 7:22 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! > > > The kid didn't have a warrant and you've been bitching for years about > wireless wiretapping. Based on what both of you have said a warrant > isn't needed if they find something illegal. > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think it's called a warrant, lol...that thing you are againt >> requiring for wiretaps. >> >>> So, you are saying the government or anyone else can invade your >>> privacy as long as they end up finding illegal activity? >>> How's that saying go? You have nothing to worry about as long as you >>> don't do anything wrong >> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317331 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
