<delete> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As was pointed out earlier, we pretty much agree on this, except for > the culpability of Palin. > > You think she bears some of the blame for what happened. I disagree with that. > > In my opinion, when you start placing blame on the victim you are > almost validating the crime and/or saying that they deserved it. > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Eric Roberts > <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >> >> That is because when you make shit up, it is lying and dishonest. You are >> attributing to us things that we never stated, much like you did with me in >> our discussion about homeschooling. >> >> Eric >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:14 AM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! >> >> >> I have not made up anything. I have expressed my opinion and >> interpretations of what you and Dana have said - most of the time >> trying to find some clarity. >> >> Its kind of funny how anyone who disagrees with you eventually gets >> called a liar and dishonest. >> >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Eric Roberts >> <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >>> >>> And that has what to do with what was stated? I am beginning to think you >>> need some glasses there Scott as you seem to not be able top read very >> well. >>> "She bears some blame for not properly securing her account" does not >> equal >>> "It's ok if they don't have a warrant if they fiond something illegal". >>> That's pretty asinine Scott and not based on any form of reality. So >>> instead of talking about my (and Dana's) opinion, you and Sam feel it >>> necessary to dishonestly make shit up and claim that Dana and I stated >> that. >>> That is called lying and is very dishonorable. Try honesty for a >>> change...you will feel a lot better about yourselves. >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 10:39 AM >>> To: cf-community >>> Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! >>> >>> >>> You have said that you feel she bears some blame for what happened. >>> That is an opinion, not fact. (and pretty much the only thing I think >>> we disagree on - at least on this issue) >>> >>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Eric Roberts >>> <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Please show where either of us have stated that Sam. I know it's hard to >>>> argue when the facts are against you, but please stop making shit >>> up....that >>>> is very dishonorable and dishonest...granted that is something that is >>>> expected from teabaggers... >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 7:22 AM >>>> To: cf-community >>>> Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! >>>> >>>> >>>> The kid didn't have a warrant and you've been bitching for years about >>>> wireless wiretapping. Based on what both of you have said a warrant >>>> isn't needed if they find something illegal. >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I think it's called a warrant, lol...that thing you are againt >>>>> requiring for wiretaps. >>>>> >>>>>> So, you are saying the government or anyone else can invade your >>>>>> privacy as long as they end up finding illegal activity? >>>>>> How's that saying go? You have nothing to worry about as long as you >>>>>> don't do anything wrong >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317369 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
