Sam I had the link in my buffer just waiting for you, cause I know you
http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=10945674 More precisely, they probably accept the ruling because they have no choice (tho hopefully the legislature is doing something about that). But a) that was a civil case so there were no "charges" b) that lady is waaay not "innocent" and c) the state took measures to prevent that type of abuse in future On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Alaska does accept the court ruling and she's innocent of all charges > you've made against her. Now your argument is the law sucks. > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Neither does the state of Alaska, look at the link right below that >> judgement. You really need to start reading for yourself. I need to go >> back to filtering you. >> >> <delete> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317395 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
