and had a heck of a lawyer apparently. I wonder if she talked to him before or after the suit.
Ah well, let's give the rest of the list a break on this. We semi-agree it seems. On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Honestly, I think the law does suck. Hopefully, Alaska uses this to > make the necessary changes to make it not suck. > > That being said, she did not break the letter of the law (though, I > may argue she violated the spirit of the law) > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Alaska does accept the court ruling and she's innocent of all charges >> you've made against her. Now your argument is the law sucks. >> >> >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Neither does the state of Alaska, look at the link right below that >>> judgement. You really need to start reading for yourself. I need to go >>> back to filtering you. >>> >>> <delete> >>> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317399 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
