oh and ... <delete> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sam > > I had the link in my buffer just waiting for you, cause I know you > > http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=10945674 > > More precisely, they probably accept the ruling because they have no > choice (tho hopefully the legislature is doing something about that). > But a) that was a civil case so there were no "charges" b) that lady > is waaay not "innocent" and c) the state took measures to prevent that > type of abuse in future > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Alaska does accept the court ruling and she's innocent of all charges >> you've made against her. Now your argument is the law sucks. >> >> >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Neither does the state of Alaska, look at the link right below that >>> judgement. You really need to start reading for yourself. I need to go >>> back to filtering you. >>> >>> <delete> >>> >> >>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317397 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
