On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > my issue is that he didn't just disclose the government emails, he > posted about the family pictures that were in there too, and then made > the password public. Had he let's say simple posted emails he thought > should not have been written with that account, I would agree that it > could be a whistleblower case. I know it's a fine line but it's an > important one. But he did say he decided to try because he wanted to > know if that was indeed what she was doing. > > So perhaps the moral is that if you are going to blow the whistle on > some perceived wrongdoing, you should avoid needless damage
You know what? I can't say I agree 100%, but I think you have a valid point there. -- Scott Stroz --------------- You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can wonder what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris http://xkcd.com/386/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317374 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
