Neither does the state of Alaska, look at the link right below that judgement. You really need to start reading for yourself. I need to go back to filtering you.
<delete> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Now you don't accept the courts ruling? > > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Sam. >> >> That's not "the" court it's "a" court. A different one. >> >> And the judge goes to great lengths to say that the Alaskan law is >> written in crayon and to invite the legislature to revise it. Look at >> the text of the judgement to the left of this story. >> >> Essentially the emails were not government records because the >> definition of public records in Alaskan law at that point required >> that they be preserved on a state server. Talk about your loopholes, >> wow. >> >> And you guys made fun of Clinton. >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317393 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
