Money isn't a factor. It is about efficacy versus side effects. Should the FDA approve a drug which is just as likely, or more likely, to cause you harm than it is to help you?
Judah On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:29 PM, G Money <gm0n3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> The maker states 50% success. >> >> The FDA is considering cost. Should they? >> > > What's the success? I'm assuming it doesn't cure the cancer, right? So are > we talking a few more weeks, months....years? > > Again, this is why they are WEIGHING the benefits vs. the costs. > > So should they? Yes. > > We hate to admit this, but there is a limit to how much one human life costs > per second. > > -- > No matter how close to yours another's steps have grown > In the end there is one dance you'll do alone > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:325147 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
