Actually my point was more about debating the issue with respect for the opposing side's view. I took your point as meaning that approach is not always practical.
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 4:33 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: interesting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party No, I was not, and you know it. I was merely putting the attitude Kris mentioned, 'who are we to tell the majority they are wrong' , into perspective. Just because the majority wants something, does not make it right. On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, Scott was comparing same sex marriage to slavery. > > > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Sisk, Kris <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> My point here was that cramming gay marriage down people's throats was >> the wrong way to go about getting it allowed. Scott's point was that >> sometimes that's the only way to get the right thing done. Your point >> seems to be that not getting married isn't as bad as slavery. Fair >> enough, but it has nothing to do with either my point or Scott's counter >> point and comes off as being nothing more than an inflammatory remark. >> >> Mayhap you should take a few deep breaths and maybe count slowly to 10 >> between posts? >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:326443 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
