It was University College in London...and I posted it...not Larry ;-) -----Original Message----- From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:46 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Fox News? Really can this be called a News channel?
it's a different study, assuming it actually happened, isn't it? I wasn't sure what I thought of Sam's source, but if the Smithsonian says it happened I guess it did. However, per Mind Hacks, the Colin Firth one is two British politicians, and the study Larry is citing involved a group of American students. I think. ::scrolls up:: On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Eric Roberts < ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > > http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2011/06/colin-firth-actor-writ > er-aca > demy-award-winner-scientist/ > > Wow...I stand corrected...but he actually only gave the scientists the > idea. > The Coauthor thing was crediting him for the idea. He didn't actually > do the study. So to say it is his study is stretching the truth quite > a bit... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:45 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Fox News? Really can this be called a News channel? > > > No really, it's the Actor that co-wrote this research for a radio show. > > > http://mindhacks.com/2011/04/10/the-oscar-for-best-neuroscience-resear > ch-goe > s-to/ > > If you want to discredit all of my sites because it doesn't fit you > view at least recognize a publicity stunt disguised as hate speech > when you see it. > > Ask yourself why the left always attacks the intelligence of people > that disagree? It's not very smart. The Right could easily do the same > yet they don't, more mature I guess. Well, Michael Savage did write a > book "Liberlism is a Mental Disorder" but he has his own issues. > > . > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Yanno, at the risk of fueling your misconceptions, Sam, I have to go > > with Larry here. You don't seriously think that, do you? You always > > go for cheapo debate points, and that makes it very hard to actually > > talk to > you. > > > > He backed up his statement, and since you didn't want to back down > > you used the old distract-them-with-stupid method. Everyone here has > > a decent brain, and has tried the baffle-them-with-bullshit route > > themselves at least once in their lives, so we know it when we see > > it, even though some of us have given you the benefit of the doubt > > more than > once. > > > > It gets old. This thread is old. So, more in sorrow than in anger: > > > > <delete> > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:346917 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
