and actually, you're right. I am angry because you are wasting my time and I am allowing it. Just be quiet and admit you have no idea how to evaluate the validity of the sample, and add that you question its findings. This is what wikipedia calls WP:IDONTLIKEIT. You are the CF equivalent. Is that not the essence of your objection. Ok. We have all registered your displeasure. Have a nice day.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Wow. You are so angry and you blame it on me. > > Do you truly believe people that don't agree with you are biologically > inferior? > > . > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> Let me point an arrow at it, Sam --->a more comprehensive study, using > >> scans from 90 people > >> > > > > > >> So we have predetermined results and a paid scientist. > >> Any idiot with common sense can tell you this study is stupid and > flawed. > > > > > > Well the idiot I am listening to is certainly saying that, but as far as > I > > can tell he is talking out of his ass. If you aren't going to > substantiate > > you ugliness then keep it to yourself. > > > > Ask your self if the study supported the opposite would you relish it? > >> Than's a joke. > >> > > > > I am not relishing it when it doesn't. You're jerking the list around. > > Again. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:346930 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
