That begs a question...if this was funded by Colin Firth (which you still haven't shown us anything to back that claim up outside of a right wing blog entry) makes it biased...why do you argue that studies on Climate Change and other issues that are openly funded by the oil industry and other corporate sources legitimate to you? That's being pretty hypocritical Sam. It's is ok in one situation but not ok in another just because you disagree with it or are offended by it? Please...show us where it says that Colin funded anything other than what he said about the 2 politicians. None of the other studies done were funded by him as far as I can tell. These all look like university studies. Reis also has some pretty serious neuroscience credentials according to the site you posted.
Eric -----Original Message----- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 10:07 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Fox News? Really can this be called a News channel? So why is every scientist that ever earned a dime from big oil irrelevant? BTW, that wasn't THE point, it was A point. . On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If a study can be disregarded because of the funding source, then > every clinical trial that has been funded by a pharmaceutical company > will have to be tossed. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347062 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
