he was not a cop. At best a vigilante, but everything says he was hunting. You also forget (conveniently no doubt) that both the criminal and civil courts did find he acted with "reckless abandon" in the matter. In other words he was hunting. And you justify this? What's next advocating for using dogs and hunting them down in the fields?
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Jerry Barnes <critic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "While yes he was robbed" > > That's really all that needs to be said. > > > "his actions both before and in response to the four men indicated that he > deliberately decided to seek that out ( severa ldays of doing similar > actions do more than suggest that) and shoot anyone who attempted to rob > him." > > Kind of like a police sting for prostitution or the recently arrested man > who was going to bomb the Capital? > > Again, there are some leftist circles who blame the victim for initiating > the crime. The real victim is the perpetrator. Your post seems to > indicate you lean this way. > > J > > - > > If some among you fear taking a stand because you are afraid of reprisals > from customers, clients, or even government, recognize that you are just > feeding the crocodile hoping he'll eat you last. - Ronald Reagan > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347332 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
