"At best a vigilante, but everything says he was hunting. " So, sitting on the subway and then getting mugged is hunting. If they wouldn't have mugged him, they would not have been shot.
" You also forget (conveniently no doubt) that both the criminal and civil courts did find he acted with "reckless abandon" in the matter." You must have missed the part about being sued above. You can reread at your leisure (or not). "In other words he was hunting." They "victims" would not have been shot if they didn't mug him. Again, the perpetrators become the victims and the victim becomes the culprit. "And you justify this?" I justify the right of anyone to defend himself or herself if they are being mugged. "What's next advocating for using dogs and hunting them down in the fields?" Really? What do you mean by them? If you mean people who mug other people, then maybe. J - I will worry about the children when they can vote in union elections. - Albert Shanker (president of the American Federation of Teachers) I never thought this day would happen. . . . I wont have to work on putting gas in my car. I wont have to work at paying my mortgage. You know. If I help him, hes gonna help me. - Peggy Josep ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347334 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
