it would be a lot harder for criminals to get guns if they were not so readily available. Would it stop the flow completely...no...but it would certainly reduce the hemorrhaging... Look at what is going on in states like AZ where i can sell you a gun, as an individual, with no background checks or anything. If i were a criminal, I would be making regular trips to AZ and have a whole bunch of legally obtained weapons. Nothing wrong with making all gun sales having a required background check and having cool down periods. That is just counterproductive. With laws like what they have in AZ...we may as well just give guns to criminals.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The logical fallacy is that if guns were not available to citizens for > their protection, criminals would not have guns. > > On 27 February 2012 11:15, Eric Roberts <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com > >wrote: > > > > > If there weren't guns on the street...or they were not as readily > > available, people wouldn't be getting > > shot....particularly kids in schools. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347427 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
