http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/27/shooting-reported-at-ohio-high-school/?hpt=hp_t1

There would be four students without gunshot wounds if we had tighter gun
control laws.  This has nothing to do with criminals.  A minor should not
have easy access to a firearm like this.

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:

> it would be a lot harder for criminals to get guns if they were not so
> readily available.  Would it stop the flow completely...no...but it would
> certainly reduce the hemorrhaging...  Look at what is going on in states
> like AZ where i can sell you a gun, as an individual, with no background
> checks or anything.  If i were a criminal, I would be making regular trips
> to AZ and have a whole bunch of legally obtained weapons.  Nothing wrong
> with making all gun sales having a required background check and having
> cool down periods.  That is just counterproductive.  With laws like what
> they have in AZ...we may as well just give guns to criminals.
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The logical fallacy is that if guns were not available to citizens for
>> their protection, criminals would not have guns.
>>
>> On 27 February 2012 11:15, Eric Roberts <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > If there weren't guns on the street...or they were not as readily
>> > available, people wouldn't be getting
>> > shot....particularly kids in schools.
>>
>>
>> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347428
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to